Yes, Joni Ernst is an extremist, thank you - Hullabaloo

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Yo Nino, what say you now?

Posted on 1:30 PM by kitkat boom
Yo Nino, what say you now?

by digby

What's the deal here?

Antonin Scalia, explicitly laid out the role of grand juries in the 1992 Supreme Court case United States v. Williams, and it is in stark contrast with what McCulloch did. Scalia wrote:

"It is the grand jury’s function not ‘to enquire … upon what foundation [the charge may be] denied,’ or otherwise to try the suspect’s defenses, but only to examine ‘upon what foundation [the charge] is made’ by the prosecutor. Respublica v. Shaffer, 1 Dall. 236 (O. T. Phila. 1788); see also F. Wharton, Criminal Pleading and Practice § 360, pp. 248-249 (8th ed. 1880). As a consequence, neither in this country nor in England has the suspect under investigation by the grand jury ever been thought to have a right to testify or to have exculpatory evidence presented.
"

The passage was first highlighted by attorney Ian Samuel, a former clerk to Justice Scalia.

But perhaps those rules don't apply to police officers?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (157)
    • ►  January (157)
  • ▼  2014 (343)
    • ►  December (217)
    • ▼  November (126)
      • He didn't become radical, the country did #Risen
      • Where's Our Anti-War Propo? Lessons from The Hunge...
      • What could have gone wrong?
      • Yo Nino, what say you now?
      • OMG Shower it on the Admiralty!
      • QOTD: Rich Lowry
      • "We always worried this would happen" Part XXX
      • Let's talk by @BloggersRUs
      • Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley ---...
      • He was afraid for his life
      • Boxcar crowd
      • "A weak man with his strong weapons" who "feels hi...
      • A twitter convo about torture
      • Chuckle of the day
      • "The audacity of taupe"
      • Damn, she's good by @BloggersRUs
      • When geniuses had to be nuns
      • Democracy in action #gerrymandering
      • Southern Democrats turn left
      • Open Carry advocates down with the cops
      • Is "kill or be killed" replacing "to protect and t...
      • Guess who's starting to worry about labor protests?
      • Go for it boys
      • The #Ferguson #fail by @BloggersRUs
      • Leftovers
      • "Unorthodox practices"
      • Oh Dad
      • Don't worry your pretty little heads about the law
      • Food, food, food.
      • Thanksgiving proclamation
      • I'll have a Black Friday without you by @BloggersRUs
      • On The Newsroom Who Pays the Price for Having Prin...
      • It's that time again... #Karentumultypumpkincaketime
      • Concerned women of America are very concerned
      • Mowing down demonstrators isn't a crime either?
      • Shame
      • Black bodies aren't weapons
      • Just like a woman; the Weiss nomination pushback h...
      • "How you go to war"
      • Shift minions getting all uppity by @BloggersRUs
      • I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed ...
      • Building the GOP bench: no girls allowed
      • Ain't it the truth? #everythingisawful
      • Troll 'o the day: An alien from another planet
      • Rodney, Trayvon and Michael
      • Celebrating tragedy with snark and idiocy
      • Enough is Enough: An "Open Rebellion Caucus" forms...
      • Big black hulk
      • No indictment by @BloggersRUs
      • Police: try love
      • QOTD: Turkish president Erdogen
      • Lyin' Ryan's at it again --- tax reform for dummies
      • How the Republicans do oversight
      • Senator Inhofe waits for the bridegroom
      • Poll 'o the Day: stupid voters speak
      • Confront the bullies and look what happens
      • Never say inevitable by @BloggersRUs
      • The hysterical ninny protocol
      • Now this is scary looking
      • QOTD: It's Giuliani time
      • Who are the liberals who trust Fox News?
      • Sunday Funnies
      • Huckleberry to the rescue
      • Cesspits of bad behavior by @BloggersRUs
      • Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley ---...
      • Feeling safer?
      • Where at least we know we're free
      • The passion of St Reagan
      • "The low information voter syndrome"
      • The other dispossessed by @BloggersRUs
      • Power and process
      • 125 million women in the world today have been mut...
      • It's just his home that's all
      • The pastor with the Mean Girl sense of humor
      • Fighting over torture
      • Compassionate at birth by @BloggersRUs
      • Let it snow!
      • Megyn Kelly accidentally tells the truth
      • What does "poisoning the well" really mean? by @Da...
      • Obama+Immigrants= Haters in full effect
      • There's always impeachment
      • QOTD: "In your heart you know he's right" edition
      • That time when Lynn Cheney said Jim Webb was full ...
      • How convenient
      • Help us call on Mark Udall to read the Torture Rep...
      • What kind of people are they? by @BloggersRUs
      • #Eventheconservativefederalistsociety ...
      • QOTD: libertarian madness
      • Doing the right thing is the best negotiating stance
      • The deeper problem with "Intelligence Reform"
      • "Influencers"
      • Today's blast from the past: Wall Street brat edition
      • Working more, earning less
      • Not gonna go there with Uber by @BloggersRUs
      • God he's loathsome #guess ...
      • How ISIS "builds its brand"
      • QOTD: Gun nut #1
      • Jobs, jobs jobs
      • It's always something
      • Washington Post creates a new boogeyman
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

kitkat boom
View my complete profile