Yes, Joni Ernst is an extremist, thank you - Hullabaloo

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Big surprise on 4/15/15

Posted on 5:00 PM by kitkat boom
Big surprise on 4/15/15

by digby

I've been writing about this for a while. I think it's going to be a big story because people simply weren't adequately warned about it:

Uncle Sam could take a bigger bite at tax time for consumers who received too much government help last year with their Obamacare premiums.

That may be just one of several surprises for millions of Americans in advance of the first tax deadline involving the Affordable Care Act.

The majority of Americans who get their health insurance at work should see few changes when filing their taxes. Most will just need to check a box on their tax return indicating they had coverage in 2014.

It stands to be more complicated for those individuals who purchased a private health plan in government-run exchanges or went without insurance at some point last year.

Obamacare launched a year ago, but it's only now that people will incur tax penalties for being uninsured. Others will realize their federal premium subsidy was incorrect.

Experts project that 40% to 50% of families that qualified for financial assistance might have to repay some portion because their actual household income for 2014 was higher than what they estimated during enrollment.

Those repayments could range from a relatively small amount to thousands of dollars in some cases. In California, some of the first clues may emerge later this month when the state issues tax notices to 1 million consumers.

About 85% of the roughly 7 million Americans who signed up last year through government-run exchanges paid discounted premiums thanks to subsidies.

"This could flip people from having a refund to not," said John Graves, an assistant professor of health policy at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. "Nobody can project their income down to the last dollar. It could be a huge deal."
[...]
About two-thirds of consumers didn't know that their 2014 tax return would be used to reconcile their subsidy amount, according to a survey by the H&R Block Tax Institute.

The lowest income people in the exchanges have their potential payback capped. But it could add up to some real money for middle class folks who made more than they expected. And it will feel as if they're being punished for doing better. It's unusual to have your bills increase just because you get a raise.

I suspect that in the long run people will begin to overestimate their incomes and look more closely at the actual cost of premiums not just what you pay after the subsidies. (Here in California they are huge --- twice what I paid for a similar plan two years ago.) They'll end up buying cheaper plans knowing that they might have to pony up a big payment if they make a mistake or unexpectedly come into some money. People will adjust. But this is another one of those surprises that most people didn't see coming that will cause a whole lot of bad press.


Someone should have mentioned this earlier:

"We are still in the first steps of a historic change, and the challenge we all have is educating Californians and all Americans on how this works," said Peter Lee, executive director of the Covered California exchange. "The individual mandate is really kicking in and some people will find out, 'Oh I actually received more of a tax credit than I should have.'"

.





.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
    QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said" by digby Oh wait, he didn't mean that either: Charles Krauthammer had a ...
  • QOTD: Bob Corker
    QOTD: Bob Corker by digby Let's forget about all that oversight nonsense, shall we? "To me, Congress having oversight certainly is ...
  • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
    QOTD: Wingnut hysterics by digby I've got your freedom loving, anti-government tyranny patriots for you right here : On a long and inter...
  • Why we still fight
    This post will stay at the top of the page for a while.  Please scroll down for new material. Why we still fight by digby Since it's Hol...
  • Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"?
    Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"? by digby   So, I'm watching Wolf Blitzer chat up former CIA honcho Bill ...
  • Why what we saw was totally not torture by @BloggersRUs
    Why what we saw was totally not torture by Tom Sullivan All the news about the CIA torture program reminded me of those batches of FBI email...
  • A little sunshine burns the suits
    A little sunshine burns the suits by digby Think Progress reports: After leaked emails in the Sony hack showed unequal pay between male and ...
  • Why you ... you want to punish success! by @BloggersRUs
    Why you ... you want to punish success! by Tom Sullivan I wanted to follow up on Steve Fraser's comments to Bill Moyers . Fraser is wo...
  • QOTD: Chris Matthews
    QOTD: Chris Matthews by digby Today on Chris Christie: I sort of liked his style in the beginning before I realized it was for real, you kno...
  • What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man?
    What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man? by digby Does it get any more callous that this? On August 27th at approximately 8...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (157)
    • ▼  January (157)
      • Fox News squirm
      • We are all mass murderers now
      • Smokin' 'em outta their caves
      • The Jeb and Mitt club
      • QOTD: Enlightenment edition
      • "She hears the voices no one else hears" by @Gaius...
      • TP-ing the SOTU by @BloggersRUs
      • Progress (MLK Day 2015) by @Batocchio9
      • Magical orcas
      • Good pope, bad pope
      • Why they fear more people voting
      • Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style
      • The Martin Luther King speech everyone ignores
      • The super-rich won't be happy until they have it all
      • Now why would they do this?
      • Quite Simply, a Masterpiece by tristero
      • The courts: Targets of opportunity by @BloggersRUs
      • A little sunshine burns the suits
      • Analyzing the threat
      • Sunday Funny: "Shake it off" edition
      • "A more aggressive form of terrorism"? Really?
      • Clout
      • Losing our collective nerve by @BloggersRUs
      • Isolationist? I don't think so.
      • He'd think you were jerks #MLK
      • Our close allies the Islamic extremists
      • "Job creators" trickling $1700 glasses of wine dow...
      • The gentlelady from North Carolina is out of order
      • A foreign policy election it is
      • Please don’t flog the bloggers by @BloggersRUs
      • I gotcher apology for yah rightcheaya
      • Scary environmental chart of the century
      • Scary political chart of the day
      • Have DC Democrats Learned Their Progressive Lesson...
      • A little welcome perspective on the threat of terr...
      • A BFD: Holder ends federal civil forfeiture
      • Why don't most Republican state legislatures allow...
      • Arkansas Project Part Two?
      • Or the terrorists win by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: Chris Matthews
      • Why are hawks reacting so differently to the Charl...
      • More grown-up governance
      • How to explain tax cuts to brainwashed people
      • Colluding with the CIA to cover up torture would b...
      • Heritage flim-flam
      • Serpico Reduxby digbyI recently linked to a post b...
      • Did we mention the stonings? by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
      • Playing the terrorist game
      • A long way to go #equalityforwomen
      • I'll defend his right to say it (but I'll condemn ...
      • Palin and the Nuge
      • Opportunity knocks for the authoritarians #destroy...
      • The free speech consensus challenge
      • Teach your cronies well by @BloggersRUs
      • Smell the freedom #flashbang
      • He's got the choo-choo train
      • Race has absolutely nothing to do with it
      • Queasy but not too worried #socialsecuritycuts
      • Terrorism rivals and allies
      • Hippies, fries and free speech
      • The road to bigotry in 140 characters
      • Stepping boldly into the past by @BloggersRUs
      • An elected official, ladies and gentlemen!
      • If we can't have him no one can
      • "Open Rebellion" Pays Off — Warren & Progressives ...
      • The Zombie Rises
      • Kind of pointless
      • The Warren wing nudges the Party
      • QOTD: David Brooks
      • Old Jeb, new Jeb
      • A legitimate question by @BloggersRUs
      • This is everything that's wrong with the world
      • Your majesty
      • Mass resistance
      • Speaking of violence
      • "If you can keep your head when all about you are ...
      • The Nones
      • Apologies excepted by @BloggersRUs
      • Big surprise on 4/15/15
      • TMCP on the hot seat
      • QOTD: Hezbollah and Hamas
      • Objectively pro-Islamic fundamentalist
      • Yes, wingnuts did blame campus speech codes for th...
      • Hippies still hurt their feelings
      • Defend our water by @BloggersRUs
      • Another liberal terrorist symp speaks out
      • The Paul Doctrine needs work
      • We need to "do nuance"
      • What do Independents really want?
      • People are working again (for peanuts)
      • Liberals are to blame of course
      • Keep Calm and Carry On by @BloggersRUs
      • That'll teach us
      • Prison Blues
      • Dynamic cheating
      • Just thought I'd mention it
      • Je suis Scorsese?
      • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
      • How It's Done — Cops Bring Notre Dame's "I Can't B...
  • ►  2014 (343)
    • ►  December (217)
    • ►  November (126)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

kitkat boom
View my complete profile