Yes, Joni Ernst is an extremist, thank you - Hullabaloo

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

No girls allowed

Posted on 3:00 PM by kitkat boom
No girls allowed

by digby

I just don't even know what to say to this:
Kay Hagan just wanted to swim. It was late 2008, and the Democrat was newly arrived on Capitol Hill as North Carolina’s junior senator-elect. But Hagan was told that the Senate pool was males-only. Why? Because some of the male senators liked to swim naked.

It took an intervention by Senator Chuck Schumer, head of the Rules Committee, to put a stop to the practice, but even then “it was a fight,” remembers pollster Celinda Lake, who heard about the incident when the pool revolt was the talk among Washington women.
[...]
In the entire history of the United States Senate, a mere 44 women have served. Ever. Those few who have were elected to a club they were never meant to join, and their history in the chamber is marked by sexism both spectacular and small. For decades in the 20th century after women first joined, many male senators were hardly more than corrupt frat boys with floor privileges, reeking of alcohol and making little secret of their sexual dalliances with constituents, employees and any other hapless subordinate female they could grab. But perhaps more striking is what I found after interviewing dozens of women senators, former senators and their aides over the past several months: Even today, the women of the Senate are confronted with a kind of floating, often subtle, but corrosive sexism, a sense of not belonging that is both pervasive and so counter to the narrative of real, if stubbornly slow, progress that many are reluctant to acknowledge this persistent secret.

That article in Politico is a must-read for anyone who thinks that all of us beyotches are just whining all the time. Note the date that this swimming pool incident happened. It wasn't 1938. It wasn't 1968. It was 2008.

Those elite Senators are fairly typical of men at the top of the heap. They can't imagine having to give up even the slightest privilege --- like not being required to wear a bathing suit in a communal pool. Indeed, the more likely explanation is that they just didn't want to share the pool with a woman at all and used that as an excuse. In either case, they behaved like pigs when confronted with losing even the slightest bit of their superior privilege over women.

Once again I'm compelled to point out just how infuriating it is to hear such men complain about women or minorities wanting "too much." It's one thing for average guys to be unaware of the sort of authority they have (and women don't have) in normal human interactions. Often women aren't exactly sure exactly what that is either even though they feel it. But when elite males with these attitudes pat themselves on the back for being the avatars of freedom, equality and democracy in action it just galls.

We are half the population and yet only 44 women have ever served in the US Senate over the course of more than two centuries. No woman has ever been nominated by one of the major political parties to be president. What do you suppose girls think when they hear that?


.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
    QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said" by digby Oh wait, he didn't mean that either: Charles Krauthammer had a ...
  • QOTD: Bob Corker
    QOTD: Bob Corker by digby Let's forget about all that oversight nonsense, shall we? "To me, Congress having oversight certainly is ...
  • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
    QOTD: Wingnut hysterics by digby I've got your freedom loving, anti-government tyranny patriots for you right here : On a long and inter...
  • Why we still fight
    This post will stay at the top of the page for a while.  Please scroll down for new material. Why we still fight by digby Since it's Hol...
  • Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"?
    Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"? by digby   So, I'm watching Wolf Blitzer chat up former CIA honcho Bill ...
  • Why what we saw was totally not torture by @BloggersRUs
    Why what we saw was totally not torture by Tom Sullivan All the news about the CIA torture program reminded me of those batches of FBI email...
  • A little sunshine burns the suits
    A little sunshine burns the suits by digby Think Progress reports: After leaked emails in the Sony hack showed unequal pay between male and ...
  • Why you ... you want to punish success! by @BloggersRUs
    Why you ... you want to punish success! by Tom Sullivan I wanted to follow up on Steve Fraser's comments to Bill Moyers . Fraser is wo...
  • QOTD: Chris Matthews
    QOTD: Chris Matthews by digby Today on Chris Christie: I sort of liked his style in the beginning before I realized it was for real, you kno...
  • What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man?
    What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man? by digby Does it get any more callous that this? On August 27th at approximately 8...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (157)
    • ▼  January (157)
      • Fox News squirm
      • We are all mass murderers now
      • Smokin' 'em outta their caves
      • The Jeb and Mitt club
      • QOTD: Enlightenment edition
      • "She hears the voices no one else hears" by @Gaius...
      • TP-ing the SOTU by @BloggersRUs
      • Progress (MLK Day 2015) by @Batocchio9
      • Magical orcas
      • Good pope, bad pope
      • Why they fear more people voting
      • Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style
      • The Martin Luther King speech everyone ignores
      • The super-rich won't be happy until they have it all
      • Now why would they do this?
      • Quite Simply, a Masterpiece by tristero
      • The courts: Targets of opportunity by @BloggersRUs
      • A little sunshine burns the suits
      • Analyzing the threat
      • Sunday Funny: "Shake it off" edition
      • "A more aggressive form of terrorism"? Really?
      • Clout
      • Losing our collective nerve by @BloggersRUs
      • Isolationist? I don't think so.
      • He'd think you were jerks #MLK
      • Our close allies the Islamic extremists
      • "Job creators" trickling $1700 glasses of wine dow...
      • The gentlelady from North Carolina is out of order
      • A foreign policy election it is
      • Please don’t flog the bloggers by @BloggersRUs
      • I gotcher apology for yah rightcheaya
      • Scary environmental chart of the century
      • Scary political chart of the day
      • Have DC Democrats Learned Their Progressive Lesson...
      • A little welcome perspective on the threat of terr...
      • A BFD: Holder ends federal civil forfeiture
      • Why don't most Republican state legislatures allow...
      • Arkansas Project Part Two?
      • Or the terrorists win by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: Chris Matthews
      • Why are hawks reacting so differently to the Charl...
      • More grown-up governance
      • How to explain tax cuts to brainwashed people
      • Colluding with the CIA to cover up torture would b...
      • Heritage flim-flam
      • Serpico Reduxby digbyI recently linked to a post b...
      • Did we mention the stonings? by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
      • Playing the terrorist game
      • A long way to go #equalityforwomen
      • I'll defend his right to say it (but I'll condemn ...
      • Palin and the Nuge
      • Opportunity knocks for the authoritarians #destroy...
      • The free speech consensus challenge
      • Teach your cronies well by @BloggersRUs
      • Smell the freedom #flashbang
      • He's got the choo-choo train
      • Race has absolutely nothing to do with it
      • Queasy but not too worried #socialsecuritycuts
      • Terrorism rivals and allies
      • Hippies, fries and free speech
      • The road to bigotry in 140 characters
      • Stepping boldly into the past by @BloggersRUs
      • An elected official, ladies and gentlemen!
      • If we can't have him no one can
      • "Open Rebellion" Pays Off — Warren & Progressives ...
      • The Zombie Rises
      • Kind of pointless
      • The Warren wing nudges the Party
      • QOTD: David Brooks
      • Old Jeb, new Jeb
      • A legitimate question by @BloggersRUs
      • This is everything that's wrong with the world
      • Your majesty
      • Mass resistance
      • Speaking of violence
      • "If you can keep your head when all about you are ...
      • The Nones
      • Apologies excepted by @BloggersRUs
      • Big surprise on 4/15/15
      • TMCP on the hot seat
      • QOTD: Hezbollah and Hamas
      • Objectively pro-Islamic fundamentalist
      • Yes, wingnuts did blame campus speech codes for th...
      • Hippies still hurt their feelings
      • Defend our water by @BloggersRUs
      • Another liberal terrorist symp speaks out
      • The Paul Doctrine needs work
      • We need to "do nuance"
      • What do Independents really want?
      • People are working again (for peanuts)
      • Liberals are to blame of course
      • Keep Calm and Carry On by @BloggersRUs
      • That'll teach us
      • Prison Blues
      • Dynamic cheating
      • Just thought I'd mention it
      • Je suis Scorsese?
      • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
      • How It's Done — Cops Bring Notre Dame's "I Can't B...
  • ►  2014 (343)
    • ►  December (217)
    • ►  November (126)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

kitkat boom
View my complete profile