Yes, Joni Ernst is an extremist, thank you - Hullabaloo

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Thank you for not voting your best interests by @BloggersRUs

Posted on 6:00 AM by kitkat boom

Thank you for not voting your best interests

by Tom Sullivan

At a party over the weekend, a couple of guests asked the question I hear time and again from friends frustrated that so many working-class people vote Republican: Why do they vote against their best interests?

It's a question that honestly perplexes and frustrates them as much as this particular verbal tic frustrates me. It's obvious to them how conservative policies hurt working people and undermine the middle class. Yet, people continue to vote Republican. But you know this.

Well, first off, people don't vote their interests. They vote their identities. This is standard Lakoff stuff. People vote for candidates they believe share their social views, not necessarily their economics. People vote for candidates they feel they can trust. People wanted to have a beer with recovering alcoholic, George W. Bush, for godssakes.

Second, step back from that question a moment and look at "voting your best interests" dispassionately. Do we really want our neighbors to go into the voting booth and vote what's best for No. 1? For their bottom lines?

Seriously. Is that who we are? Is that the kind of country we want? Does that reflect our values?

Because by posing the same question over and over, and by using it as an accusation against working-class, white voters, are we not sending the message that that is exactly how we think people should vote? Bottom line? Every man for himself?

I understand people's frustration, but that is just the Randian, social Darwinism we oppose. Counter it. Don't reinforce it. Complaints that people are voting against their best interests are not reinforcing a more progressive message, that as Americans we are all in this together and should vote with an eye for the general welfare. Maybe we should stop voicing them.

Worse, the fact that so many on the left frame the question in "best interests" terms suggests that we ourselves have unconsciously internalized our opponents' messaging.

And while we may think it a legitimate, innocent question, family members, coworkers, and conservative sparring partners hear it as arrogant and condescending — a liberal dog whistle. "You're voting against your best interests" sounds like a snooty, intellectual's way of saying, "You're stupid." If we're looking for reasons they don't vote with us, we may have found one.

It's godawful messaging. I wish we would stop it.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
    QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said" by digby Oh wait, he didn't mean that either: Charles Krauthammer had a ...
  • QOTD: Bob Corker
    QOTD: Bob Corker by digby Let's forget about all that oversight nonsense, shall we? "To me, Congress having oversight certainly is ...
  • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
    QOTD: Wingnut hysterics by digby I've got your freedom loving, anti-government tyranny patriots for you right here : On a long and inter...
  • Why we still fight
    This post will stay at the top of the page for a while.  Please scroll down for new material. Why we still fight by digby Since it's Hol...
  • Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"?
    Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"? by digby   So, I'm watching Wolf Blitzer chat up former CIA honcho Bill ...
  • Why what we saw was totally not torture by @BloggersRUs
    Why what we saw was totally not torture by Tom Sullivan All the news about the CIA torture program reminded me of those batches of FBI email...
  • A little sunshine burns the suits
    A little sunshine burns the suits by digby Think Progress reports: After leaked emails in the Sony hack showed unequal pay between male and ...
  • Why you ... you want to punish success! by @BloggersRUs
    Why you ... you want to punish success! by Tom Sullivan I wanted to follow up on Steve Fraser's comments to Bill Moyers . Fraser is wo...
  • QOTD: Chris Matthews
    QOTD: Chris Matthews by digby Today on Chris Christie: I sort of liked his style in the beginning before I realized it was for real, you kno...
  • What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man?
    What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man? by digby Does it get any more callous that this? On August 27th at approximately 8...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (157)
    • ▼  January (157)
      • Fox News squirm
      • We are all mass murderers now
      • Smokin' 'em outta their caves
      • The Jeb and Mitt club
      • QOTD: Enlightenment edition
      • "She hears the voices no one else hears" by @Gaius...
      • TP-ing the SOTU by @BloggersRUs
      • Progress (MLK Day 2015) by @Batocchio9
      • Magical orcas
      • Good pope, bad pope
      • Why they fear more people voting
      • Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style
      • The Martin Luther King speech everyone ignores
      • The super-rich won't be happy until they have it all
      • Now why would they do this?
      • Quite Simply, a Masterpiece by tristero
      • The courts: Targets of opportunity by @BloggersRUs
      • A little sunshine burns the suits
      • Analyzing the threat
      • Sunday Funny: "Shake it off" edition
      • "A more aggressive form of terrorism"? Really?
      • Clout
      • Losing our collective nerve by @BloggersRUs
      • Isolationist? I don't think so.
      • He'd think you were jerks #MLK
      • Our close allies the Islamic extremists
      • "Job creators" trickling $1700 glasses of wine dow...
      • The gentlelady from North Carolina is out of order
      • A foreign policy election it is
      • Please don’t flog the bloggers by @BloggersRUs
      • I gotcher apology for yah rightcheaya
      • Scary environmental chart of the century
      • Scary political chart of the day
      • Have DC Democrats Learned Their Progressive Lesson...
      • A little welcome perspective on the threat of terr...
      • A BFD: Holder ends federal civil forfeiture
      • Why don't most Republican state legislatures allow...
      • Arkansas Project Part Two?
      • Or the terrorists win by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: Chris Matthews
      • Why are hawks reacting so differently to the Charl...
      • More grown-up governance
      • How to explain tax cuts to brainwashed people
      • Colluding with the CIA to cover up torture would b...
      • Heritage flim-flam
      • Serpico Reduxby digbyI recently linked to a post b...
      • Did we mention the stonings? by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
      • Playing the terrorist game
      • A long way to go #equalityforwomen
      • I'll defend his right to say it (but I'll condemn ...
      • Palin and the Nuge
      • Opportunity knocks for the authoritarians #destroy...
      • The free speech consensus challenge
      • Teach your cronies well by @BloggersRUs
      • Smell the freedom #flashbang
      • He's got the choo-choo train
      • Race has absolutely nothing to do with it
      • Queasy but not too worried #socialsecuritycuts
      • Terrorism rivals and allies
      • Hippies, fries and free speech
      • The road to bigotry in 140 characters
      • Stepping boldly into the past by @BloggersRUs
      • An elected official, ladies and gentlemen!
      • If we can't have him no one can
      • "Open Rebellion" Pays Off — Warren & Progressives ...
      • The Zombie Rises
      • Kind of pointless
      • The Warren wing nudges the Party
      • QOTD: David Brooks
      • Old Jeb, new Jeb
      • A legitimate question by @BloggersRUs
      • This is everything that's wrong with the world
      • Your majesty
      • Mass resistance
      • Speaking of violence
      • "If you can keep your head when all about you are ...
      • The Nones
      • Apologies excepted by @BloggersRUs
      • Big surprise on 4/15/15
      • TMCP on the hot seat
      • QOTD: Hezbollah and Hamas
      • Objectively pro-Islamic fundamentalist
      • Yes, wingnuts did blame campus speech codes for th...
      • Hippies still hurt their feelings
      • Defend our water by @BloggersRUs
      • Another liberal terrorist symp speaks out
      • The Paul Doctrine needs work
      • We need to "do nuance"
      • What do Independents really want?
      • People are working again (for peanuts)
      • Liberals are to blame of course
      • Keep Calm and Carry On by @BloggersRUs
      • That'll teach us
      • Prison Blues
      • Dynamic cheating
      • Just thought I'd mention it
      • Je suis Scorsese?
      • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
      • How It's Done — Cops Bring Notre Dame's "I Can't B...
  • ►  2014 (343)
    • ►  December (217)
    • ►  November (126)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

kitkat boom
View my complete profile