Yes, Joni Ernst is an extremist, thank you - Hullabaloo

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, January 19, 2015

Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style

Posted on 2:00 PM by kitkat boom
Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style

by digby

I don't know if he's misinformed or lying but this is the kind of lunacy that we are going to be seeing more of. It's obvious that terrorism fear-mongering is back on the menu:
LONDON — In a foreign policy speech delivered Monday in London, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said that in the West, "non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home."

The Republican governor added that "it is startling to think that any country would allow, even unofficially, for a so-called 'no-go zone'."

Jindal remarks came during an address to the Henry Jackson Society in a committee room at the U.K.'s House of Commons with several British members of parliament attending.
[...]
In his speech, Jindal warned attendees that he was going to say things that would not be deemed politically correct. "So brace yourselves," he said, noting that he had no interest in defaming any religion, but "dealing with reality and facts."

"And the fact is that radical Islamists do not believe in freedom or common decency nor are they willing to accommodate them in any way and anywhere," he said.

Jindal is traveling through Europe on a 10-day economic development mission that could also bolster his foreign policy credentials as he considers a possible presidential campaign.

"We spent several days here, had the chance to meet with several elected leaders and what you hear from them, for example, these so-called no-go zones," he told NBC News in an interview. "I think it's a mistake for any country to allow the development of areas within their country, whether it's neighborhoods or other areas, where the same laws, the same values, the same rules, simply don't apply."
This is utter nonsense. There are no "no-go" zones where officials have just given up sovereignty and where the laws and rules of the state don't apply. But you have to love the chutzpah of this moron prefacing all his lies and misstatements by saying he "dealing with reality and facts". These are "reality and facts" that even Fox News has disowned and apologized for:
If Fox News anchors hadn’t gotten the message before, they will now: The network isn’t going to sanction loose and utterly unsupported chatter about Muslim “no-go zones” in Europe. In its programming last night, Fox News issued two corrections on the matter, one of which acknowledged that “we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe, particularly with regard to England and France.” That came from Julie Banderas during the Saturday night program “Fox Report.”

She continued: “To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country and no credible information to support the assertion there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion.”

Later in the evening, Jeanine Pirro, host of “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” presented her own correction for the centerpiece of Fox News’s “no-go zone” week. On her Jan. 10 program, Pirro welcomed terrorism analyst Steve Emerson to speak about these zones, which Emerson described this way: “They’re sort of amorphous, they’re not contiguous necessarily, but they’re sort of safe havens. And they’re places where the governments, like France, Britain, Sweden, Germany — they don’t exercise any sovereignty so you basically have zones where Sharia courts are set up, where Muslim density is very intense, where police don’t go in.” Though Emerson claimed that this phenomenon plagued Europe very broadly, he zeroed in on Birmingham, England: “There are actual cities like Birmingham that are totally Muslim, where non-Muslims just simply don’t go in,” he said. (A separate no-go-zone correction was issued by”Fox & Friends” on Saturday morning.)

In her correction, Pirro laid responsibility for the bad information on Emerson, and on her failure to correct him: “Last week on this program,” said Pirro, “a guest made a serious factual error that we wrongly let stand unchallenged and uncorrected. The guest asserted that the city of Birmingham, England, is totally Muslim and that it is a place where non-Muslims don’t go . Both are incorrect.” She went on to provide 2011 census data noting that 22 percent of the city’s population self-identifies as Muslim and that there’s no evidence of the whole no-go thing.

Not bad, though a review of the offending segment reveals that Pirro’s errors extend beyond just the failure to challenge Emerson. She gave the impression that she was rooting for these falsehoods. “This is metastasizing into a simple takeover,” she said at one point of the Muslim presence in Europe.

The Emerson-Pirro exchange mushroomed into a big problem for Fox News. Not only did the usual media-watchdog suspects hammer the network for trading in nonsense, the British prime minister did as well. “When I heard this, frankly, I choked on my porridge and I thought it must be April Fools’ Day,” said David Cameron, who finished with this rip against Emerson: “This guy’s clearly a complete idiot.”

Even before Emerson embarrassed Fox News on an international level, the network was pushing the no-go myth. On Jan. 7, three days before Emerson’s assertions, Fox News host Sean Hannity said this: “It seems if you watch in recent years, it’s not just France but all of Europe, there’s been a major influx, immigration, people from Muslim countries. They’ve even — and they’ve not assimilated, they’ve separated,” said Hannity. “They have no-go zones. If you’re non-Muslim, you’re not allowed. Not police, not even fire department if there’s a fire. Sharia courts have been allowed to be established. Prayer rugs in just about every hotel.”
Here's Punditfact:
Sometimes a claim is so egregious that a prime minister chokes on his porridge.

So infuriating that international backlash spurs a sassy hashtag and leads the speaker to apologize profusely the very next day.

So wrong that even though it’s already been widely debunked, people are still asking that we give it the PunditFact treatment.

Such is the case with a comment about Birmingham, England, by news pundit Steve Emerson, who appeared as a guest Jan. 10, 2015, on Fox News’ Justice with Judge Jeanine.

Host Jeanine Pirro introduced Emerson as founder of The Investigative Project on Terrorism for a segment about "no-go" zones for non-Muslims in Europe. Emerson said the zones exist in France and throughout the rest of Europe as "safe havens" for Muslims ruled by Sharia courts and not a country’s own laws.

"In Britain, it’s not just no-go zones," Emerson said. "There are actual cities like Birmingham that are totally Muslim, where non-Muslims just simply don’t go in. And parts of London, there are actually Muslim religious police that actually beat and actually wound seriously anyone who doesn't dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire."

Western Europe is just not dealing with the situation, he said.

Western Europe, meanwhile, did not seem amused by his comment. And make no mistake, the claim is wrong.

The city of Birmingham, situated north and west of London, has more than 1 million residents. There are more whites and Christians than any other ethnicity or religion, we found.

According to a report of the 2011 UK Census by the Birmingham City Council, 46 percent of residents said they were Christian and 22 percent, or 234,111 people, identified as Muslim.

No doubt, Islam is a growing and popular faith in Birmingham, up 7.5 percentage points from 2001 to 2011. Three Birmingham wards, Heath, Bordesley Green and Sparkbrook, had Muslim populations that exceeded half of the population, all ranging from 70 percent to about 77 percent.

Not that this gives any credence to Emerson’s claim about the city of Birmingham as a whole. This does not amount to the city "being totally Muslim."

Emerson apologized on his website and on the BBC, among other forums, for his remarks. He attributed his statement about Birmingham to sloppy fact-checking. (No kidding.) Here is the apology:
I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error. And I am issuing this apology and correction for having made this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham. I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful. There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham. I am not going to make any excuses. I made an inexcusable error. And I am obligated to openly acknowledge that mistake. I wish to apologize for all residents of that great city of Birmingham.

Steve Emerson

PS. I am making (a) donation to Birmingham Children's Hospital.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, who really did say the remark caused him to choke on his porridge, called Emerson a "complete idiot."

"He started with an apology," Cameron said. "That's not a bad start. But what he should do is look at Birmingham and see what a fantastic example it is bringing people together of different faiths and different backgrounds and building a world-class brilliant city with a great and strong economy."

Birmingham is about 20% Muslim.

This is the kind of hysteria we managed not to stoke to much after 9/11. When someone like Jindal just ignores the facts even when Fox News apologizes and retreats, it's easy to see where this is headed.

Update: Here's Allen West complaining that a meeting of American Muslims to denounce ISIS and islamophobia is "incendiary" at a time like this.  He didn't hold up the Charlie-Hebdo cover but I'm sure he would have done it without the slightest sense of irony:


Update II: @AndyWitney noted the fact that we have some Americans who believe in "no-go zones" right here at home. Cliven Bundy comes to mind ... he and his friends fought off federal agents with firearms.

But that's completely different, of course. Because Muslims.
.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
    QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said" by digby Oh wait, he didn't mean that either: Charles Krauthammer had a ...
  • QOTD: Bob Corker
    QOTD: Bob Corker by digby Let's forget about all that oversight nonsense, shall we? "To me, Congress having oversight certainly is ...
  • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
    QOTD: Wingnut hysterics by digby I've got your freedom loving, anti-government tyranny patriots for you right here : On a long and inter...
  • Why we still fight
    This post will stay at the top of the page for a while.  Please scroll down for new material. Why we still fight by digby Since it's Hol...
  • Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"?
    Why not hire a professional liar to tell the "truth"? by digby   So, I'm watching Wolf Blitzer chat up former CIA honcho Bill ...
  • Why what we saw was totally not torture by @BloggersRUs
    Why what we saw was totally not torture by Tom Sullivan All the news about the CIA torture program reminded me of those batches of FBI email...
  • A little sunshine burns the suits
    A little sunshine burns the suits by digby Think Progress reports: After leaked emails in the Sony hack showed unequal pay between male and ...
  • Why you ... you want to punish success! by @BloggersRUs
    Why you ... you want to punish success! by Tom Sullivan I wanted to follow up on Steve Fraser's comments to Bill Moyers . Fraser is wo...
  • QOTD: Chris Matthews
    QOTD: Chris Matthews by digby Today on Chris Christie: I sort of liked his style in the beginning before I realized it was for real, you kno...
  • What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man?
    What can possibly excuse the police abusing a blind man? by digby Does it get any more callous that this? On August 27th at approximately 8...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (157)
    • ▼  January (157)
      • Fox News squirm
      • We are all mass murderers now
      • Smokin' 'em outta their caves
      • The Jeb and Mitt club
      • QOTD: Enlightenment edition
      • "She hears the voices no one else hears" by @Gaius...
      • TP-ing the SOTU by @BloggersRUs
      • Progress (MLK Day 2015) by @Batocchio9
      • Magical orcas
      • Good pope, bad pope
      • Why they fear more people voting
      • Cranking up the crazy, Jindal style
      • The Martin Luther King speech everyone ignores
      • The super-rich won't be happy until they have it all
      • Now why would they do this?
      • Quite Simply, a Masterpiece by tristero
      • The courts: Targets of opportunity by @BloggersRUs
      • A little sunshine burns the suits
      • Analyzing the threat
      • Sunday Funny: "Shake it off" edition
      • "A more aggressive form of terrorism"? Really?
      • Clout
      • Losing our collective nerve by @BloggersRUs
      • Isolationist? I don't think so.
      • He'd think you were jerks #MLK
      • Our close allies the Islamic extremists
      • "Job creators" trickling $1700 glasses of wine dow...
      • The gentlelady from North Carolina is out of order
      • A foreign policy election it is
      • Please don’t flog the bloggers by @BloggersRUs
      • I gotcher apology for yah rightcheaya
      • Scary environmental chart of the century
      • Scary political chart of the day
      • Have DC Democrats Learned Their Progressive Lesson...
      • A little welcome perspective on the threat of terr...
      • A BFD: Holder ends federal civil forfeiture
      • Why don't most Republican state legislatures allow...
      • Arkansas Project Part Two?
      • Or the terrorists win by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: Chris Matthews
      • Why are hawks reacting so differently to the Charl...
      • More grown-up governance
      • How to explain tax cuts to brainwashed people
      • Colluding with the CIA to cover up torture would b...
      • Heritage flim-flam
      • Serpico Reduxby digbyI recently linked to a post b...
      • Did we mention the stonings? by @BloggersRUs
      • QOTD: "I obviously did not mean what I clearly said"
      • Playing the terrorist game
      • A long way to go #equalityforwomen
      • I'll defend his right to say it (but I'll condemn ...
      • Palin and the Nuge
      • Opportunity knocks for the authoritarians #destroy...
      • The free speech consensus challenge
      • Teach your cronies well by @BloggersRUs
      • Smell the freedom #flashbang
      • He's got the choo-choo train
      • Race has absolutely nothing to do with it
      • Queasy but not too worried #socialsecuritycuts
      • Terrorism rivals and allies
      • Hippies, fries and free speech
      • The road to bigotry in 140 characters
      • Stepping boldly into the past by @BloggersRUs
      • An elected official, ladies and gentlemen!
      • If we can't have him no one can
      • "Open Rebellion" Pays Off — Warren & Progressives ...
      • The Zombie Rises
      • Kind of pointless
      • The Warren wing nudges the Party
      • QOTD: David Brooks
      • Old Jeb, new Jeb
      • A legitimate question by @BloggersRUs
      • This is everything that's wrong with the world
      • Your majesty
      • Mass resistance
      • Speaking of violence
      • "If you can keep your head when all about you are ...
      • The Nones
      • Apologies excepted by @BloggersRUs
      • Big surprise on 4/15/15
      • TMCP on the hot seat
      • QOTD: Hezbollah and Hamas
      • Objectively pro-Islamic fundamentalist
      • Yes, wingnuts did blame campus speech codes for th...
      • Hippies still hurt their feelings
      • Defend our water by @BloggersRUs
      • Another liberal terrorist symp speaks out
      • The Paul Doctrine needs work
      • We need to "do nuance"
      • What do Independents really want?
      • People are working again (for peanuts)
      • Liberals are to blame of course
      • Keep Calm and Carry On by @BloggersRUs
      • That'll teach us
      • Prison Blues
      • Dynamic cheating
      • Just thought I'd mention it
      • Je suis Scorsese?
      • QOTD: Wingnut hysterics
      • How It's Done — Cops Bring Notre Dame's "I Can't B...
  • ►  2014 (343)
    • ►  December (217)
    • ►  November (126)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

kitkat boom
View my complete profile